Variation of Recognizing Atypical ECG Patterns of Occlusion Myocardial Infarction among Emergency Physicians in Egypt

Document Type : Original papers

Authors

1 Emergency Medicine and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt, 31511

2 Vascular Diseases and Emergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt, 31511

3 Cardiovascular Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt, 31511

Abstract

Background: Therefore, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings can identify occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) sooner and more accurately for emergent reperfusion The aim of this work was to identify the degree of familiarity of Egyptian emergency physicians with different levels of training and experience with atypical ECG patterns associated with OMI not meeting classic ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI) criteria. Methods: This cross-sectional survey screening study was carried out on 301 physicians dealing with patients presenting by chest pain in particular Emergency physicians, specialities, both sexes, with varying levels of experience and post-graduate clinical training: Bachelor's degree, Master’s degree, Egyptian fellowship, Arab Board, and Medical doctorate. Main bulk of our survey questionnaire included 10 ECG patterns, classified into 4 main groups. All participants subjected to: questionnaire generated using Google form was anonymous. Results: Graduates of Yemeni medical school scored less than their Egyptian counterparts (P= 0.03). However, all other nationalities didn’t show any differences. A cardiologist scored 0.91 higher than an emergency medicine physician (P < 0.01). However, all other specialities scored the same as the emergency medicine physician. A physician with a medical doctorate scored higher than MBBCH (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Our study showed results like other published international studies as regards the difficult interpreting ECGs. Cardiologists with long years of experience and/or candidates who had medical doctorate degree were the most who truly recognized the ECG patterns with OMI.

Keywords

References

  1. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). Circ J. 2004;110:588-636.https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000134791.68010.fa
  2. Wang K, Asinger RW, Marriott HJ. ST-segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2128-35.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra022580
  3. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2012;126:2020-35.
  4. Pendell Meyers H, Bracey A, Lee D, et al. Accuracy of OMI ECG findings versus STEMI criteria for diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021;33:100-27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100767
  5. REBEL EM. Upping Our ECG Game: Upping Our ECG Game: OMI vs STEMI - REBEL EM - Emergency Medicine Blog. Available from: https://rebelem.com/upping-our-ecggame-omi-vs-stemi/. 2024;7:44-9.
  6. Stapczynski S. Missed myocardial infarction: ECG strategies to reduce the risk. J Emerg Med. 2009;8:113-24.
  7. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, et al. Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2180-6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.072
  8. Wung SF, Drew BJ. New electrocardiographic criteria for posterior wall acute myocardial ischemia validated by a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty model of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:970-4.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01431-x
  9. Oraii S, Maleki M, Tavakolian AA, et al. Prevalence and outcome of ST-segment elevation in posterior electrocardiographic leads during acute myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 1999;32:275-8.
  10. Braat SH, Brugada P, den Dulk K, et al. Value of lead V4R for recognition of the infarct coronary artery in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:1538-41.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(84)90575-7
  11. Brown L, Sims J, Conforto A. Posterior myocardial infarction with isolated ST elevations in V8 and V9: Is this an "ST elevation MI"? Can J Emerg Med. 2003;5:115-8.https://doi.org/10.1017/s1481803500008265
  12. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:481-7.https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199602223340801
  13. Kontos MC, McQueen RH, Jesse RL, et al. Can myocardial infarction be rapidly identified in emergency department patients who have left bundle-branch block? Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:431-8.https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2001.114900
  14. Zalenski RJ, Cooke D, Rydman R, et al. Assessing the diagnostic value of an ECG containing leads V4R, V8, and V9: the 15-lead ECG. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:786-93.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80792-9
  15. Brady WJ, Hwang V, Sullivan R, et al. A comparison of 12- and 15-lead ECGS in ED chest pain patients: impact on diagnosis, therapy, and disposition. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18:239-43.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90112-8
  16. Sharkey SW, Berger CR, Brunette DD, et al. Impact of the electrocardiogram on the delivery of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:550-3.https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(94)90331-x
  17. Attia ZI, Harmon DM, Behr ER, et al. Application of artificial intelligence to the electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:4717-30.https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab649
  18. Aufderheide TP, Brady WJ. Electrocardiography in the patient with myocardial ischemia or infarction. In: Gibler WB, Aufderheide TP, editors. Emergency cardiac care. 51. St. Louis: Mosby St. Louis, MO; 1994. p. 169-216.
  19. Larson DM, Menssen KM, Sharkey SW, et al. "False-positive" cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298:2754-60.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.23.2754
  20. Modan B, Sharon E, Jelin N. Factors contributing to the incorrect diagnosis of pulmonary embolic disease. Chest. 1972;62:388-93.https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.62.4.388

 

The Egyptian Journal of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
Volume 5, Issue 1
January 2025
Pages 7-23

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics