Ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) versus fiber- optic bronchoscopy-guided (PDT) in critically ill patients.

Document Type : Original papers

Authors

1 lecturer critical care departement faculty of medicine , Beni suef university,Beni-Suef,Egypt

2 Lecturer of radiodiagnosis Radiology department ,Faculty of medicine ,Beni Suef University,Beni-Suef,Egypt

3 Lecturer of pulmonology Pulmonology department,faculty of medicine ,Beni Suef University,Beni-Suef,Egypt

4 Professor of ENT ENT department ,faculty of medicine ,Beni Suef University,Beni-Suef,Egypt

5 professor of Critical Care Medicine Critical Care Department Faculty of Medicine ; Beni-Suef University,Beni-Suef,Egypt

Abstract

Abstract
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is routinely performed by bronchoscopy guided technique in the intensive care unit. Recently, ultrasound has become a potentially useful tool for PDT to reduce procedure-related complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of real time ultrasound guided PDT compared to bronchoscopy-guided PDT in critically ill patients.
Methods: Randomized controlled trial, done from March 2017 to March 2019 .30 patients were eligible;15 were assigned to bronchoscopy guided PDT and the other 15 were assigned to ultrasound (us) guided PDT.
Main results: There was no statistically significant correlation between procedure type and primary outcomes except for hypoxia and minor bleeding(10 patients in the bronchoscopic group versus 3 patients in the ultrasound guided group ) p=.01. .Regarding secondary outcome ,there was no significant correlation between procedure type ant final hospital outcome.
Conclusion: Ultrasound guided PDT can be used to decrease complications during the procedure with comparable results with bronchoscope.
Keywords
Ultrasound, Tracheostomy, Bronchoscopy

Keywords